Move-away moms

 

     For many years the Equal Justice Foundation has pointed out that any man with the intelligence to understand Colorado law has to be functionally insane to marry and a drooling idiot to sire a child. It is appropriate to note on this Father's Day that rather than moving to fix the train wreck of families and marriage in this state, a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court moves us closer to days of darkness.

     Among others, a study by Sanford Braver and his associates at Arizona State University, Relocation of Children After Divorce and Children's Best Interests, makes a strong argument against moving children far away from their fathers.

      Ignored was the precedent set in the April 29, 2004, decision by the California Supreme Court in the LaMusga case that if the custodial parent (typically mom) moved far away  it placed an unreasonably high burden on the non-custodial parent (typically Dad). The California Supreme Court also stated that the disruption of contact with a responsible father constituted a "harm" to children.

     But logic has had little impact on the redfem Colorado Supreme Court, who ruled on June 6, 2005, in case 03 SC 751  that mom has the right to move away simply because she wants to, and even though she has not found employment in the new location.

     I know many readers of this newsletter are currently struggling with this issue in Colorado courts and I can only offer our sympathy. I personally struggled with maintaining contact with my sons when their mother took them without notice to Colorado and I was forced to commute between Missouri, and later Massachusetts in order to maintain our relationship. They are now 27 and 30 but I still see problems in my sons that stem from the divorce although I have always somehow managed to remain close to them.

      The Equal Justice Foundation again pledges to continue the battle against such injustices and to fight for the restoration of the rightful place of children, families (including fathers, mothers, and grandparents), and marriage in our lives.

Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.


June 15, 2005 - The Colorado Supreme Court held that the trial courts had abused their discretion by "prematurely" concluding there is a value to giving both parents ample access to their child.

The court was more concerned with the advantages that the child would receive by staying with the "primary caregiver."

Justice Nancy Rice, writing for the court, held a mother has a constitutional right to travel, which must be balanced against the right of the biological father to help raise his child. On balance, the custodial mother's right to travel was more important than the noncustodial father's rights to raise his child.


In Colorado, women no longer have to demonstrate that moving out of state is in the best interests of the child. Instead, the supreme court is focused on the mother's right to travel. For more information, click on the following link: case03 SC 751


Disclaimer

   The Equal Justice Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation supported by members and contributions. Dues are $25 per year and you may join at http://www.ejfi.org/Join.htm

    Contributions are tax deductible and can be made on the Web at http://www.ejfi.org/join2.htm or by sending a check to the address below.

    Federal employees in Colorado can contribute to the EJF through the Combined Federal Campaign. We are listed in four Colorado regions. In the Denver region our agency number is 4086. In Larimer County # 8032. In Weld County # 4022. In SW Colorado (Mesa Verde-Durango) # A003.

    The mailing list of the Equal Justice Foundation is not distributed to third parties. Occasionally members are put in touch with other individuals on our mailing list when there are known common interests or problems. In normal circumstances permission is requested of the third party before disclosing their e-mail address. Prior permission is not sought if referral is made to another group or individual working on the same, or related problems, and that group or individual is known to seek such referrals.
______________________________________________

Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.
President, Equal Justice Foundation http://www.ejfi.org/
455 Bear Creek Road
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906-5820
Telephone: (719) 520-1089
Domestic violence against men in Colorado: http://www.dvmen.org
Personal home page: http://corry.ws

Curriculum vitae: http://www.marquiswhoswho.net/charleselmocorry/Default.aspx

 

The good men may do separately is small compared with what they may do collectively.

Benjamin Franklin

Home
About Michael Guth
Corporate Law
Employment Law
Free Legal Advice
Law Newspaper Articles
Law School Course Outlines
Sample Court Pleadings
Financial Economist and Legal Brief Writer, Editor-in-Chief Michael A. S. Guth

Dr. MICHAEL A. S. GUTH
Attorney at Law
Ph.D. (Economics), J.D. Univ. of Tenn.
Licensed in Tennessee since 1998
send e-mail
(E-mail is quickest method of contact).
Hours: Monday - Friday: 9:30 AM  - 6 PM,
Saturday & Sunday 1 PM - 6 PM.


  116 Oklahoma Ave.
  Oak Ridge, TN
  37830-8604
  Phone: (865) 483-8309



DISCLAIMER. This web page was written by a lawyer, and it discusses legal issues. It would not be complete without a disclaimer. This web page and all its constituent parts and all the various links are provided subject to and governed expressly by the terms of this disclaimer. I provide this site for educational purposes and to stimulate a discussion among people with a common interest in legal issues. I do not warrant or represent the accuracy or timeliness of the information contained in this page or any of its constituent pages. Neither this web site nor the articles contained on it are legal advice. The information presented is not intended to be advice as to a specific fact pattern with which the reader may be presented. This web site and articles describe general, non-specific legal information. They are not intended to cover all the issues related to the topics discussed. Any member of the public must exercise caution in trying to apply general information about the law to the specific facts of some matter of concern. Accordingly, please note that by using this page you acknowledge that the information at this site is being provided "as is" and not as legal advice on any matter. No atttorney-client relationship is hereby established between the reader and Dr. Michael Guth. I also make no representation as to the authorship, quality, reliability or accuracy of any of the links from this page or any of its constituent pages. Pages linked to which are not maintained by me may be subject to other terms and conditions. Neither this web site nor the articles contained therein are solicitations. Rather they inform the public about legal services and non-legal services offered by attorney Michael Guth. By accessing this page, you acknowledge that you have both read this disclaimer and understood its terms, as a condition to visiting my site. "In a perfect world we wouldn't need this disclaimer, but in a perfect world, you wouldn't need lawyers either. " -- Ms. Parry Aftab.


© Copyright 2007 by Michael A. S. Guth. All Rights Reserved.  No portion of this site, including this home page and
any of the separate pages, may be copied, retransmitted, reposted, or duplicated in significant portion without the express written permission of Dr. Michael Guth. Users are always welcome to establish links to this web page or to quote from it freely.

Additional Pro Se Related Research Pages:

Index 1
Index 2