Move-away moms
For many years the Equal Justice Foundation has pointed out that any man with
the intelligence to understand Colorado law has to be functionally insane to
marry and a drooling idiot to sire a child. It is appropriate to note on this
Father's Day that rather than moving to fix the train wreck of families and
marriage in this state, a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court moves us
closer to days of darkness.
Among others, a study by Sanford Braver and
his associates at Arizona State University, Relocation of
Children After Divorce and Children's Best Interests, makes a strong
argument against moving children far away from their fathers.
Ignored was the precedent set in the April 29, 2004, decision by the California
Supreme Court in the LaMusga
case that if the custodial parent (typically mom) moved far away it placed an unreasonably high burden on the non-custodial
parent (typically Dad). The California Supreme Court also stated that the
disruption of contact with a responsible father constituted a "harm"
to children.
But logic has had little impact on the
redfem Colorado Supreme Court, who ruled on June 6, 2005, in case 03 SC 751
that mom has the right to move away simply because she wants to, and
even though she has not found employment in the new location.
I know many readers of this
newsletter are currently struggling with this issue in Colorado courts and I
can only offer our sympathy. I personally struggled with maintaining contact with
my sons when their mother took them without notice to Colorado and I was forced
to commute between Missouri, and later Massachusetts in order to maintain our
relationship. They are now 27 and 30 but I still see problems in my sons that
stem from the divorce although I have always somehow managed to remain close to
them.
The Equal Justice Foundation again pledges to continue the battle against such
injustices and to fight for the restoration of the rightful place of children,
families (including fathers, mothers, and grandparents), and marriage in our
lives.
Charles E.
Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.
June 15, 2005 - The Colorado Supreme Court held that the trial courts had abused their
discretion by "prematurely" concluding there is a value to giving
both parents ample access to their child. Disclaimer The Equal Justice Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) corporation supported by members and contributions. Dues are $25 per
year and you may join at http://www.ejfi.org/Join.htm Contributions are tax deductible and can be
made on the Web at http://www.ejfi.org/join2.htm or by sending a check to the
address below. Federal employees in Colorado can contribute to
the EJF through the Combined Federal Campaign. We are listed in four Colorado
regions. In the Denver region our agency number is 4086. In Larimer County #
8032. In Weld County # 4022. In SW Colorado (Mesa Verde-Durango) # A003. The mailing list of the Equal Justice
Foundation is not distributed to third parties. Occasionally members are put in
touch with other individuals on our mailing list when there are known common
interests or problems. In normal circumstances permission is requested of the
third party before disclosing their e-mail address. Prior permission is not
sought if referral is made to another group or individual working on the same,
or related problems, and that group or individual is known to seek such
referrals. Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A. Curriculum vitae:
http://www.marquiswhoswho.net/charleselmocorry/Default.aspx The good men may do separately is small compared with what
they may do collectively. Benjamin Franklin
The court was more concerned with the advantages that the child would receive
by staying with the "primary caregiver."
Justice Nancy Rice, writing for the court, held a mother has a constitutional right to travel, which must be
balanced against the right of the biological father to help raise his child. On balance, the custodial mother's right to
travel was more important than the noncustodial father's rights to raise his child.
In Colorado, women no longer have to demonstrate that moving out of state is in the best
interests of the child. Instead, the supreme court is focused on the mother's right to travel. For more information, click
on the following link: case03 SC 751
______________________________________________
President, Equal Justice Foundation http://www.ejfi.org/
455 Bear Creek Road
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906-5820
Telephone: (719) 520-1089
Domestic violence against men in Colorado: http://www.dvmen.org
Personal home page: http://corry.ws
Home About Michael Guth Corporate Law Employment Law Free Legal Advice Law Newspaper Articles Law School Course Outlines Sample Court Pleadings

Dr. MICHAEL A. S. GUTH
Attorney at Law
Ph.D. (Economics), J.D. Univ. of Tenn.
Licensed in Tennessee since 1998
send e-mail
(E-mail is quickest method of contact).
Hours: Monday - Friday: 9:30 AM
- 6 PM,
Saturday & Sunday 1 PM - 6 PM.
116 Oklahoma Ave.
Oak Ridge, TN
37830-8604
Phone: (865) 483-8309
|
|